Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose?

25 Min Read

The power of printing fiat is greatly underappreciated by society and also among many of us so called “gold bugs”. You and I direct extraordinary time and energy to earn fiat bucks printed by the money changers. From your first day of kindergarten to your day of retirement, you hone skills and work for the paper printed by the money changers. This is not questioned because it is all we have seen our entire life… which is short by historical standards.

I’ll use the phrase “money changers” to connect with the historic reference of those who initially swapped redeemable notes for physical gold and later evolved to modern day banks printing fiat.

Anyone aware of the history of money knows gold is money. Unfortunately, if you own gold it never grows. To grow wealth gold has to be sold, the proceeds invested (think treasuries) and later converted back into gold. Hopefully this swap returns more gold than originally owned, otherwise the swap failed. Call this the “big swap”. Gold is money so all that matters is return in gold terms.

Based on that simple premise, the masters of fiat need marketplace stability for long periods… decades… as they issue debt. Why? If “the big swap” doesn’t achieve a return (in gold terms)… debt will NOT be bought as an investor will be better off just holding gold.

Last year’s 27% increase in gold compared to treasuries 4.5% yield is a flag. If it was believed that negative return would continue in the future… the fiat game is over.

For that reason the money changers have to create long lasting stable periods… Decades. That requires money changers containing gold’s value in fiat.

The quandary is… running the world’s fiat system has zero power unless you create fiat. That’s how they exploit their system… by printing fiat.

You can see the dynamic. They want to print fiat, but convince all that their fiat isn’t devaluing. Gold is the most important metric of fiat’s value.

After compounding for decades, printing fiat eventually, and always, catches up with them. Thousands of years of history proves that. Regardless of that fact, 99.9% of people fall for the money changers trick. Charles de Gaulle is a good example of the 0.1% when he demanded gold for his fiat bucks. Soon thereafter there was a devaluation by a factor of 20.

My point is… revaluation of gold / fiat cannot be done frequently otherwise it undermines stability.

And now we can move on…

Apparently Trump’s motto is: Go big or go home. Gold at $2,900 values the US’s 8,100 tonne at a measly $0.8 T. Do you really think he’s going to tweak the monetary system to put a lousy $0.8 trillion onto the balance sheet?

Not long ago that 8,100 tonne of gold backed the entire financial system of the West. That gold backed the $US directly and Europe’s currencies indirectly as they pegged to $US.

That $0.8 T is peanuts compared to debt of $36 T and annual spending budgets of $4.8 T. That $0.8 would be enough to run the government for 2 months.

Revaluing gold to $2,900 would change the debt to GDP ratio from 1.19 to 1.17. It’s the same number!

Most importantly, a small patch just begs for gold to continue its accent (or more accurately, fiat’s decline) to further save the system. I explained above why that instability is fatal to the fiat system. This is happening now as central bank sell dollars and guy gold.

A revaluation to $2,900 per oz would be a tiny patch on a fatal wound of excessive spending and debt. If you’re thinking a revaluation to $2900… go home. Trump will stay.

Gold will be revalued to something much higher. The goal will be to kick the fiat can DECADES down the road. Why? So fiat can function for another long stable period.

What price could that be? One target could be to get the debt to GDP ratio into a zone where the fiat system can function for decades longer. If I assume that target is 0.50, a gold price of $79,000 per oz will accomplish that.

How can Trump change gold to $79,000 per oz? Easy, he announces that the Treasury will buy any gold offered for sale at $79,000. This is just a devaluation of the dollar. He can create fiat and buy your gold. As soon as the market realizes that, there is no need to rush to Trump’s gold window to sell your gold. Trump’s price will be the price everywhere.

The loser is bond holders… and the money changers need them for the following decades. Furthermore, after this revaluation there is no incremental increase in the ability to service debt, so the stressed debt service metrics will continue.

So… amend the plan. Tax gold at, say 28%. After the revaluation, all gold has a new cost basis of $2,900 regardless of what you originally paid. When you sell your gold, tax will be due at the new price less $2,900 times 0.28.

How much gold is in the hands of US taxable entities? I don’t know. If I assume 1.0 billion oz (12.7% of the world’s total), that will be a huge windfall to the treasury.

In that 28% tax scenario, what gold price is required to drive the debt to GDP to 0.50? A gold price of $40,000 would revalue the 8,100 tonne gold owned by the government to $10.4 T and also raise $10.4 T in tax revenue. That drives debt to GDP to 0.50.

Proceeds from the tax can be used to buy treasuries and make bondholders less sad.

Proceed onward for decades with peace and prosperity! Gold holders get a lot more of the latter, but they deserve it for understanding history.

Reproduction, in whole or in part, is authorized as long as it includes all the text hyperlinks and a link back to the original source.

The information contained in this article is for information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell.

Editorial note: This recovered market brief has been cleaned and reclassified by Next Move Markets for educational market intelligence. It is not investment advice.

For active traders, this brief should be read through the lens of precious metals rather than as a standalone headline. The key question is whether the theme behind Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? can influence positioning beyond the first reaction. That means watching real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand together, not in isolation.

A richer trading read comes from separating the catalyst from confirmation. The catalyst explains why markets are paying attention; confirmation comes from price action, liquidity and cross-asset behavior after the headline is digested. If those signals do not align, traders should treat the move as fragile and keep risk tighter.

  • Whether real yields and the dollar move together or send conflicting signals for gold.
  • How traders react around prior swing highs, lows and liquidity zones.
  • Whether safe-haven flows are broad-based or limited to a short headline reaction.
  • ETF flow, futures positioning and inflation data that could validate or weaken the move.

This article is a market-intelligence brief, not a trade recommendation. Before acting on the theme, traders should define invalidation, position size and the time horizon of the setup. The same headline can support a short-term reaction and still fail as a multi-session trend if liquidity, policy expectations or broader sentiment move the other way.

The base case is that traders keep this theme on the radar while waiting for confirmation from real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand. A stronger continuation scenario requires follow-through after the first reaction, preferably with related assets moving in the same direction. A failure scenario develops if the headline is quickly absorbed, volatility fades and price returns inside the previous range.

For precious metals, the most useful approach is to compare the article theme with live market behavior. If the market confirms the narrative, pullbacks can become more constructive. If the market rejects it, the headline becomes background noise rather than a trading driver.

  • Define the level first: traders should know where the idea is invalidated before thinking about upside or downside.
  • Separate news from setup: Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? may explain attention, but entry quality still depends on timing, liquidity and risk/reward.
  • Watch confirmation: a clean move usually appears across related markets, not only in one isolated instrument.
  • Control exposure: if volatility expands, smaller position sizing can be more professional than chasing the headline.

Next Move Markets treats this kind of brief as a starting point for preparation: identify the driver, map the scenarios, then wait for the market to prove which path is actually being priced.

For active traders, this brief should be read through the lens of precious metals rather than as a standalone headline. The key question is whether the theme behind Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? can influence positioning beyond the first reaction. That means watching real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand together, not in isolation.

A richer trading read comes from separating the catalyst from confirmation. The catalyst explains why markets are paying attention; confirmation comes from price action, liquidity and cross-asset behavior after the headline is digested. If those signals do not align, traders should treat the move as fragile and keep risk tighter.

  • Whether real yields and the dollar move together or send conflicting signals for gold.
  • How traders react around prior swing highs, lows and liquidity zones.
  • Whether safe-haven flows are broad-based or limited to a short headline reaction.
  • ETF flow, futures positioning and inflation data that could validate or weaken the move.

This article is a market-intelligence brief, not a trade recommendation. Before acting on the theme, traders should define invalidation, position size and the time horizon of the setup. The same headline can support a short-term reaction and still fail as a multi-session trend if liquidity, policy expectations or broader sentiment move the other way.

The base case is that traders keep this theme on the radar while waiting for confirmation from real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand. A stronger continuation scenario requires follow-through after the first reaction, preferably with related assets moving in the same direction. A failure scenario develops if the headline is quickly absorbed, volatility fades and price returns inside the previous range.

For precious metals, the most useful approach is to compare the article theme with live market behavior. If the market confirms the narrative, pullbacks can become more constructive. If the market rejects it, the headline becomes background noise rather than a trading driver.

  • Define the level first: traders should know where the idea is invalidated before thinking about upside or downside.
  • Separate news from setup: Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? may explain attention, but entry quality still depends on timing, liquidity and risk/reward.
  • Watch confirmation: a clean move usually appears across related markets, not only in one isolated instrument.
  • Control exposure: if volatility expands, smaller position sizing can be more professional than chasing the headline.

Next Move Markets treats this kind of brief as a starting point for preparation: identify the driver, map the scenarios, then wait for the market to prove which path is actually being priced.

For active traders, this brief should be read through the lens of precious metals rather than as a standalone headline. The key question is whether the theme behind Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? can influence positioning beyond the first reaction. That means watching real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand together, not in isolation.

A richer trading read comes from separating the catalyst from confirmation. The catalyst explains why markets are paying attention; confirmation comes from price action, liquidity and cross-asset behavior after the headline is digested. If those signals do not align, traders should treat the move as fragile and keep risk tighter.

  • Whether real yields and the dollar move together or send conflicting signals for gold.
  • How traders react around prior swing highs, lows and liquidity zones.
  • Whether safe-haven flows are broad-based or limited to a short headline reaction.
  • ETF flow, futures positioning and inflation data that could validate or weaken the move.

This article is a market-intelligence brief, not a trade recommendation. Before acting on the theme, traders should define invalidation, position size and the time horizon of the setup. The same headline can support a short-term reaction and still fail as a multi-session trend if liquidity, policy expectations or broader sentiment move the other way.

The base case is that traders keep this theme on the radar while waiting for confirmation from real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand. A stronger continuation scenario requires follow-through after the first reaction, preferably with related assets moving in the same direction. A failure scenario develops if the headline is quickly absorbed, volatility fades and price returns inside the previous range.

For precious metals, the most useful approach is to compare the article theme with live market behavior. If the market confirms the narrative, pullbacks can become more constructive. If the market rejects it, the headline becomes background noise rather than a trading driver.

  • Define the level first: traders should know where the idea is invalidated before thinking about upside or downside.
  • Separate news from setup: Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? may explain attention, but entry quality still depends on timing, liquidity and risk/reward.
  • Watch confirmation: a clean move usually appears across related markets, not only in one isolated instrument.
  • Control exposure: if volatility expands, smaller position sizing can be more professional than chasing the headline.

Next Move Markets treats this kind of brief as a starting point for preparation: identify the driver, map the scenarios, then wait for the market to prove which path is actually being priced.

For active traders, this brief should be read through the lens of precious metals rather than as a standalone headline. The key question is whether the theme behind Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? can influence positioning beyond the first reaction. That means watching real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand together, not in isolation.

A richer trading read comes from separating the catalyst from confirmation. The catalyst explains why markets are paying attention; confirmation comes from price action, liquidity and cross-asset behavior after the headline is digested. If those signals do not align, traders should treat the move as fragile and keep risk tighter.

  • Whether real yields and the dollar move together or send conflicting signals for gold.
  • How traders react around prior swing highs, lows and liquidity zones.
  • Whether safe-haven flows are broad-based or limited to a short headline reaction.
  • ETF flow, futures positioning and inflation data that could validate or weaken the move.

This article is a market-intelligence brief, not a trade recommendation. Before acting on the theme, traders should define invalidation, position size and the time horizon of the setup. The same headline can support a short-term reaction and still fail as a multi-session trend if liquidity, policy expectations or broader sentiment move the other way.

The base case is that traders keep this theme on the radar while waiting for confirmation from real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand. A stronger continuation scenario requires follow-through after the first reaction, preferably with related assets moving in the same direction. A failure scenario develops if the headline is quickly absorbed, volatility fades and price returns inside the previous range.

For precious metals, the most useful approach is to compare the article theme with live market behavior. If the market confirms the narrative, pullbacks can become more constructive. If the market rejects it, the headline becomes background noise rather than a trading driver.

  • Define the level first: traders should know where the idea is invalidated before thinking about upside or downside.
  • Separate news from setup: Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? may explain attention, but entry quality still depends on timing, liquidity and risk/reward.
  • Watch confirmation: a clean move usually appears across related markets, not only in one isolated instrument.
  • Control exposure: if volatility expands, smaller position sizing can be more professional than chasing the headline.

Next Move Markets treats this kind of brief as a starting point for preparation: identify the driver, map the scenarios, then wait for the market to prove which path is actually being priced.

For active traders, this brief should be read through the lens of precious metals rather than as a standalone headline. The key question is whether the theme behind Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? can influence positioning beyond the first reaction. That means watching real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand together, not in isolation.

A richer trading read comes from separating the catalyst from confirmation. The catalyst explains why markets are paying attention; confirmation comes from price action, liquidity and cross-asset behavior after the headline is digested. If those signals do not align, traders should treat the move as fragile and keep risk tighter.

  • Whether real yields and the dollar move together or send conflicting signals for gold.
  • How traders react around prior swing highs, lows and liquidity zones.
  • Whether safe-haven flows are broad-based or limited to a short headline reaction.
  • ETF flow, futures positioning and inflation data that could validate or weaken the move.

This article is a market-intelligence brief, not a trade recommendation. Before acting on the theme, traders should define invalidation, position size and the time horizon of the setup. The same headline can support a short-term reaction and still fail as a multi-session trend if liquidity, policy expectations or broader sentiment move the other way.

The base case is that traders keep this theme on the radar while waiting for confirmation from real yields, dollar direction, inflation expectations and safe-haven demand. A stronger continuation scenario requires follow-through after the first reaction, preferably with related assets moving in the same direction. A failure scenario develops if the headline is quickly absorbed, volatility fades and price returns inside the previous range.

For precious metals, the most useful approach is to compare the article theme with live market behavior. If the market confirms the narrative, pullbacks can become more constructive. If the market rejects it, the headline becomes background noise rather than a trading driver.

  • Define the level first: traders should know where the idea is invalidated before thinking about upside or downside.
  • Separate news from setup: Gold Revaluation? Go Big Or Go Home: Which Would Donald Trump Choose? may explain attention, but entry quality still depends on timing, liquidity and risk/reward.
  • Watch confirmation: a clean move usually appears across related markets, not only in one isolated instrument.
  • Control exposure: if volatility expands, smaller position sizing can be more professional than chasing the headline.

Next Move Markets treats this kind of brief as a starting point for preparation: identify the driver, map the scenarios, then wait for the market to prove which path is actually being priced.

Share This Article